Product Returns and Exchanges: Why Even an Equal-Value Swap Needs the Right Documents

Decision 1475/2025 of the Dispute Resolution Directorate (DED) of the Greek tax authority highlights a point that many retail businesses overlook: handling product returns and exchanges is not an informal process. The trigger was a fridge magnet worth EUR 2. The outcome was a EUR 1,000 fine.
The case in brief
At a gift kiosk, tax inspectors found that no retail receipt was issued for the sale of a fridge magnet worth EUR 2. The sales assistant argued that this was not a new sale but an exchange for a product of equal value, and that she chose not to issue a new receipt to avoid creating a cash shortfall. The DED rejected the appeal and the fine was upheld.
Why it was treated as a violation
The tax authority's reasoning rested on two points, both of them instructive:
- The EUR 2 was collected from the customer at that moment, in front of the inspectors. Whatever the transaction was called, it was a transaction that required a receipt.
- Even if it genuinely was a return, the business should have issued a retail credit note (article 12 §4 of Law 4308/2014, Greek Accounting Standards). Avoiding the issue of a document on the grounds of a cash shortfall was not accepted as a justification.
The correct way to handle a return or exchange
When a customer returns a product and takes another in its place, even of exactly the same value and without a single extra euro changing hands, the correct handling involves two steps:
- Issue a retail credit note for the returned product, so that the original sale is reversed in the books.
- Issue a new retail receipt for the product handed over in its place.
This way, the flow of documents follows the actual movement of goods and the till reconciles, with no reason to cut corners.
The fine is not linked to the value of the transaction
The fine for failing to issue a document is calculated on the VAT of the transaction, but it cannot be lower than EUR 500. For small transactions, therefore, the amount bears no relation to the value of the product. In this case the fine came to EUR 1,000, because repeat offending also played an aggravating role: the same violation had been recorded before, within the previous five years, and the minimum fine was doubled. Repeat violations make penalties significantly heavier.
Practical steps for your business
- Establish a clear, written procedure for returns and exchanges, and make sure every person working the till knows it.
- Train staff to issue a credit note and a new receipt for every exchange, even when the difference is zero.
- Make sure your fiscal device or POS system handles returns correctly, so that it does not register a cash shortfall.